Samoa Digital Library

Family planning in Pacific Island Countries and Territories

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baritama HarringtonI, Relmah
dc.contributor.author Harvey, Nichole
dc.contributor.author Larkins, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-09T01:29:18Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-09T01:29:18Z
dc.date.issued 2021-08-05
dc.identifier.citation HarringtonRB, Harvey N, Larkins S, Redman-MacLaren M (2021) Family planning in Pacific Island Countriesand Territories (PICTs): A scoping review. PLoS ONE 16(8): e0255080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255080 en_US
dc.identifier.uri ${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/1534
dc.description 32 pages : PDF en_US
dc.description.abstract The use of contraceptives for family planning improves women’s lives and may prevent maternal deaths. However, many women in low and middle-income countries, including the Pacific region, still die from pregnancy-related complications. While most health centers offer family planning services with some basic contraceptive methods, many people do not access these services. More than 60% of women who would like to avoid or delay their pregnancies are unable to do so. This scoping review identifies and analyses evidence about family planning service provision in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), with the aim of better informing family planning services for improved maternal health outcomes in the Pacific. We used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review guidelines, supported by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien to identify gaps in family planning service provision. Selected studies included peer-reviewed publications and grey literature that provided information about family planning services from 1994 to 2019. Publication data was charted in MS Excel. Data were thematically analysed and key issues and themes identified. A total of 45 papers (15 peer-reviewed and 30 grey literature publications) were critically reviewed. Five themes were identified: i) family planning services in the Pacific; ii) education, knowledge and attitudes; iii) geographical isolation and access; iv) socio-cultural beliefs, practices and influences; and v) potential enabling factors for improved family planning, such as appropriate family planning awareness by health care providers and services tailored to meet individual needs. While culture and religion were considered as the main barriers to accessing family planning services, evidence showed health services were also responsible for limiting access. Family planning services do not reach everyone. Making relevant and sustainable improvements in service delivery requires generation of local evidence. Further research is needed to understand availability, accessibility and acceptability of current family planning services for different age groups, genders, social and marital status to better inform family planning services in the Pacific. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.title Family planning in Pacific Island Countries and Territories en_US
dc.title.alternative A scoping review en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Saili Sadil


Vaavaai

O a'u faʻamatalaga