dc.contributor.author |
Eyraud, Corine |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-12-11T02:46:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-12-11T02:46:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Eyraud C. (2022) Archaeology of a Quantification Device: Quantification, Policies and Politics in French Higher Education. In: Mennicken A., Salais R. (eds) The New Politics of Numbers. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6_9 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6_ |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/1689 |
|
dc.description |
29 ; PDF |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This paper follows a quantification device – French higher education performance indicators – from its birth through its construction to its uses. It differentiates three levels of analysis. First, the bedrock level: a calculative device is grounded in a founding vision. Second, the intermediate level: a quantification device contains a conception of the “raisons d’être” of the entity that is quantified. Third, the level of the micro-conventions of calculation which can give a particular orientation. However, the device is part of a larger configuration which constitutes the fourth dimension of our analytical grid. Levels and context are the fruit of socio-historical processes which can, but must not, lead to maximum coherence. Here, the device is not a very integrated assemblage, which explains its limited effects. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Springer Nature |
en_US |
dc.subject |
New Public Management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Performance indicators |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Higher education |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Calculative device |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Valuation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Quantification |
en_US |
dc.title |
Archaeology of a QuantificationDevice: Quantification, Policies and Politics in French Higher Education |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |