Samoa Digital Library

Health Education about Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Community-Based Cluster Randomized Trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Oliveira, Kaciane K. B.
dc.contributor.author Nascimento1, Bruno R.
dc.contributor.author Beaton, , Andrea Z. ...et.al.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-10T00:19:42Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-10T00:19:42Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06
dc.identifier.citation Oliveira KKB, Nascimento BR, Beaton AZ, Nunes MCP, Silva JLP, Rabelo LC, Barbosa MM, Oliveira CM, Mata MD, Costa WAA, Pereira AF, Sable CA, Ribeiro ALP, On behalf of the PROVAR investigators. Health Education about Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Community-Based Cluster Randomized Trial. Global Heart . 2020; 15(1): 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.347 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.347
dc.identifier.uri ${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/180
dc.description data, tables, graphs, ; 11 p. (includes bibliographical references) en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The burden of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is still high in Brazil. Lack of population awareness about the disease limits the efficacy of prevention programs. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of education on RHD in schools, comparing the conventional expository teaching method with tablet-based worked examples. Method: A prospective, cluster randomized trial was conducted over eight months in six randomly selected low-income Brazilian public schools. Each class was considered a cluster (total: 90), being randomized 1:1 to receive one of the educational methods. Pre-test evaluated students’ prior knowledge on RHD. Post-tests, 10 days, and three months later, evaluated retention of knowledge. Results: At total 1,301 students (52% female) completed the study, being 63% from high school. Baseline knowledge about RHD was universally low (average score expository classes [G1] 33.9% vs. worked examples [G2] 32.5%, p = 0.23). A significant but similar improvement was observed in both groups in the immediate post-test (pre- vs. post: p < 0.001): G1 57.5% vs. G2 56.7%, p = 0.69. In the late post-test, a significant 20% worsening was observed in both groups and the final scores were again similar: G1 45.0% vs. G2 45.9%, p = 0.87. Highschool students had higher scores (p < 0.001), and girls had better overall performances than boys (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The novel technology of tablet-based worked examples had similar results compared with expository classes for RHD education in schools. Both educational processes resulted in modest gains in knowledge, with low retention. More studies are needed to determine if increased knowledge leads to behavioral changes that could reduce RHD burden. Highlights: • In a cluster-randomized trial, two different educational strategies about Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) for children – standard expository classes and worked examples based on interactive modules in tablet computers – were compared in public schools of underserved Brazilian neighborhoods. • Baseline knowledge was low, and the novel tablet-based technology had similar results compared with traditional teaching for RHD education in schools, with no differences in acquisition and mid-term retention of knowledge. • Both educational interventions resulted in similar 71% improvement in the immediate post-test, although with suboptimal retention, with over 20% worsening in three months in both groups. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Edwards Lifesciences Foundation en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ubiquity Press en_US
dc.subject rheumatic heart disease en_US
dc.subject health education en_US
dc.subject worked examples en_US
dc.subject schools en_US
dc.subject screening en_US
dc.title Health Education about Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Community-Based Cluster Randomized Trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Saili Sadil


Vaavaai

O a'u faʻamatalaga