Samoa Digital Library

Nutritional screening of older people in a sub-acute care facility in Australia and its relation to discharge outcomes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author VISVANATHAN, RENUKA
dc.contributor.author PENHALL, ROBERT
dc.contributor.author CHAPMAN, IAN
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-07T05:08:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-07T05:08:06Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh078
dc.identifier.uri ${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/1487
dc.description 6 p. ; PDF en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: to determine the prevalence of under-nutrition using brief screening methods and to determine the relation between these results and (1) those of a more standard nutritional assessment and (2) discharge outcomes. Design: prospective study. Subjects: 65 (21 males) patients older than 65 years. Setting: sub-acute care facility. Measurements: the Mini Nutritional Assessment, standard nutritional assessment, ‘rapid screen’ and discharge outcome. Results: the prevalence of under-nutrition was high, ranging from 35.4% to 43.1%, depending on the screening method used. Compared to the standard nutritional assessment the ‘rapid screen’ consisting of (1) body mass index <22 kg/m2; and/or (2) reported weight loss of > 7.5% over the previous 3 months and the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (at risk subjects (46% of total) further evaluated using standard nutritional assessment) had sensitivities of 78.6 and 89.5% and specificities of 97.3 and 87.5% respectively in diagnosing under-nutrition. Under-nourished patients as identified by the standard nutritional assessment (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017), the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017) and the rapid screen (56.5% (under-nourished) versus 21.4% (nourished); P =0.004) were more likely to be discharged to an acute hospital or an accommodation with increased support (poor discharge outcomes) than nourished patients. Conclusion: all screening methods identified patients more likely to have a poor discharge outcome. The highly specific but less sensitive ‘rapid screen’ may be the best method in facilities with limited resources as it can be easily incorporated into nursing/medical admissions and avoids biochemical investigations in all patients. The more sensitive two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment is better if resources permit. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en_US
dc.subject sub acute care en_US
dc.subject screening en_US
dc.subject under nutrition en_US
dc.subject elderly en_US
dc.subject poor outcome en_US
dc.title Nutritional screening of older people in a sub-acute care facility in Australia and its relation to discharge outcomes en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account