Samoa Digital Library

Test-retest reliability of a self-reported physical activity environment instrument for use in rural settings

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cleland, Verity 
dc.contributor.author Timperio, Anna 
dc.contributor.author J. Sharman, Melanie
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-13T04:47:35Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-13T04:47:35Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03-17
dc.identifier.citation DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12625 en_US
dc.identifier.uri ${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/2225
dc.description 13 pages : PDF en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: Little is known about how the physical environment impacts physical activity behavior among rural populations, who are typically less active and at higher risk of chronic disease than urban dwellers. The lack of individual-level instruments to assess the physical environment in rural areas limits advancement of this field. Among rural adults, this study aimed to evaluate (a) the test-retest reliability of a self-reported questionnaire of individual-level perceptions of the physical activity environment, and (b) the stability of a self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire repeated twice, 2 weeks apart. The questionnaire included 94 items relating to the perceived physical environment (representing nine summary scores), demographic characteristics and physical activity. Setting: Rural Australia. Participants: Rurally residing adults (≥18 years) across three Australian states. Main outcome measures: Test-retest reliability evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics (individual items) and intra-class correlations (summary scores). Results: A total of 292 participants (20% men) completed both questionnaires, on average 22 days apart. Test-retest reliability of individual items ranged from weighted Kappa 0.37-0.85 (median: 0.59). Internal reliability for five summary scores was good to excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81-0.97). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for six summary scores (intra-class correlations: 0.67-0.77). Conclusions: The findings indicated good to excellent test-retest reliability for most items, particularly “fixed” constructs for this new questionnaire measuring the perceived physical environment in rural populations. This study represents an important step towards improving measurement of physical activity environments in rural populations, potentially leading to better tailored interventions to promote active and healthy living in rural areas. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship National Heart Foundation of Australia, Grant/Award Number: 100046 and 100444; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley-Blackwell en_US
dc.subject epidemiologic methods, public health, rural population, surveys and questionnaires en_US
dc.title Test-retest reliability of a self-reported physical activity environment instrument for use in rural settings en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account