dc.contributor.author |
Geiger, Ben Baumberg |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-03-30T02:09:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-03-30T02:09:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
: Geiger, BB (2017) Benefits conditionality for disabled people: stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, vol 25, no 2, 107–28, DOI: 10.1332/175982717X14939739331010 |
sm |
dc.identifier.issn |
• Online ISSN 1759 8281 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/3609 |
|
dc.description |
22 p. ; PDF |
sm |
dc.description.abstract |
While behavioural conditionality for disability benefit claimants has been increasing, there is little evidence on its implementation or impacts. This article summarises existing studies, alongside an international review based on 140 documents and 38 expert interviews, into four ‘stylised facts’: (1) requirements for disability benefit claimants are common, but sanctioning is rare; (2) assessment and support are critical for implementing conditionality; (3) limited but robust existing evidence suggests that sanctioning may have zero or even negative impacts on work-related outcomes for disabled people; and (4) individual case studies suggest that sanctioning can lead to destitution and affect mental health. |
sm |
dc.language.iso |
en |
sm |
dc.publisher |
Journal of Poverty and Social Justice |
sm |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, vol 25, no 2, 107–28; |
|
dc.subject |
Sanctions |
sm |
dc.subject |
Activation |
sm |
dc.subject |
Disability |
sm |
dc.subject |
Benefits |
sm |
dc.subject |
Social security |
sm |
dc.subject |
welfare reform |
sm |
dc.title |
Benefits conditionality for disabled people: stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice |
sm |
dc.title.alternative |
Disability and Conditional Social Security Benefits |
sm |
dc.type |
Article |
sm |