Using knowledge brokering to produce  community-generated evidence

Harris, Janet; Springett, Jane; Mathews, Debbie ...et.al.

dc.contributor.author	Harris, Janet
dc.contributor.author	Springett, Jane
dc.contributor.author	Mathews, Debbie ...et.al.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-04-04T01:02:10Z
dc.date.available	2022-04-04T01:02:10Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	Harris, J., Springett, J., Mathews, D., Weston, G. and Foster, A. (2021) Using knowledge brokering to produce community-generated evidence, Evidence & Policy, vol xx, no xx, 1–17, DOI: 10.1332/174426421X16190024737973	sm
dc.identifier.issn	• Online ISSN 1744-2656 •
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16190024737973
dc.identifier.uri	${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/3668
dc.description	17 p. ; PDF	sm
dc.description.sponsorship	Background: Devolution and integration of health and social care have placed increasing pressure on local statutory services, with a corresponding shift of health and social care to community organisations. The voluntary and charitable sector (VCS) is expected to make the case for increased funding by providing evidence of value and impact. Aims and objectives: This paper explores the challenges of compiling evidence on health outcomes which do not reflect the holistic nature of VCS support. We document how knowledge brokering can be used to enable the VCS to generate evidence. Key conclusions: Knowledge brokering (KB) may be an effective approach for developing community-generated evidence. Brokering is also needed to change perspectives on what counts as good evidence.	sm
dc.language.iso	en	sm
dc.publisher	Policy Press	sm
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Evidence & Policy • vol xx • no xx • 1–17 •;
dc.subject	knowledge brokering	sm
dc.subject	voluntary sector	sm
dc.subject	participatory evaluation	sm
dc.title	Using knowledge brokering to produce community-generated evidence	sm
dc.type	Article	sm